Re: The UN and Human Rights

Posted by t getty on March 15, 2003 at 15:58:11:

In Reply to: The UN and Human Rights posted by Michael Sidiropoulos on January 25, 2003 at 07:42:42:

: The United Nations have recently appointed Libya as the current leader in the human rights effort. China, a stalinist state with the worst possible record on human rights, is a powerful member of the UN Security Council influencing major decisions of global impact. The majority of UN member countries are totalitarian states, who cannot claim to represent their people and yet are allowed to influence world affairs and UN policy. It is time to realize the irrelevance of the UN and to replace it by an organization of democratic nations.
The United Nations has shown it's true face within the lasy yearsof existance as an impotent body of
body of egotists . The same body that agrees to support the butcher of bagdad
would also elect farcile heads of human rights organizations for
one reason ;the UN has become a farce itself .
The League of Nations and the UN both have the comonality of being
formed at the end of two terrible wars . They both were supposed
to assembled representatives of unholy states with impossible records
Without an armed powerful body to exercise providential wisdom to
iradicate the unjust ,it authorizes venues for the unjust to appear
holy .
The UN has failed to sanction current war withIraq and it also allowed
Libyia to be head of human rights . This spells an end to Us involvement.
The Us must be allowed to protect itself from attacks by premptive

Responses:

© 1990-2004 European Journal of International Law
All comments and suggestions should be sent to webmaster
This site is part of the Academy of European Law online, a joint partnership of the Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law and the Academy of European Law at the European University Institute.
This file was last modified: Monday, May 05, 2003 12:25PM